Diskussion:Hauptseite/Archiv

Fehlerberichte

Bitte hier vermerken:

Übersetzung: Plural-Singular-Mischmasch

Auf Seiten mit ungesichteten Versionen: "Es gibt 1 ausstehende Änderung, die noch markiert werden müssen." -> "Es gibt 1 ausstehende Änderung, die noch markiert werden muss." (oder alte Version "1 Version steht noch zur Sichtung an."). Ähnliches beim Bearbeiten ungesichteter Version in bereits gesichteten Artikeln: "Momentan gibt es 1 Änderung die noch überprüft werden müssen." -> "Momentan gibt es 1 Änderung die noch überprüft werden muss." --YMS 16:21, 4. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Fixed in translatewiki: [1] and [2] Raymond 11:59, 8. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Backlog notice on watchlist

The notice "There is currently a backlog of pending changes to reviewed pages. Your attention is needed!" appears on my watchlist, no matter if there are any unreviewed versions at all. --YMS 16:30, 4. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

In fact, de.wp never displays this notice, nor the one with pending edits on my watchlist. --YMS 09:32, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

This notice is hidden per CSS on de.wiki. Raymond 12:01, 8. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Notice removed. Voice of All 01:04, 9. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Do not show page content below diffs

If the option "Do not show page content below diffs" is used, and a "pending edits" link is clicked from the watchlist (URL like this: http://de.labs.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Venus_(Planet)&oldid=27308&diff=cur ), a blank page appears (not if parameter &diffonly=0 is appended). --YMS 16:47, 4. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Voice of All 01:05, 9. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Missing right to roll back

There's no "rollback" link for editors. --YMS 09:00, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

The right wasn't granted to Editors on this test site. Done. Voice of All 21:39, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Captchas for registered users

When including new external links, I have to enter a captcha code even though I'm logged in. --YMS 09:00, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

In fact, the captcha is required even on some pages with no weblinks at all (e.g. every single edit in Mogulreich, which simply consists of test content like "neuneu" by now). --YMS 09:19, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Was not true when I had some images in there?!? --YMS 09:32, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

"Accept the pending changes" disappears when using preview

When clicking on "Show preview" or "Show changes" (or "Submit changes" if a warning or a Captcha follows by this), the checkbox "Accept the pending changes" disappears under some (yet unknown) conditions - maybe just for the first version following to an unreviewed version. --YMS 09:19, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Voice of All 01:06, 9. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

("Accept the pending changes" appears when editing articles with no reviewed version)

In fact, this is the same behavior as in de.wp now. But if I remember right, this used to differ, so so no one could review a complete article by accident, if he only wanted to review his edit. --YMS 09:19, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. I'm assuming the old behavior was undesirable. Voice of All 01:06, 9. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Comments for reviews

de.wp disabled the feature for giving comments to reviews a long time ago, since users thought they had to give one, and so they didn't do any reviews at all. --YMS 09:32, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

The are not disabled. In fact it would be useful to have them displayed - see: de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:Gesichtete_Versionen/Nachsichtung#Notizzettel_bzw._Sichtungskommentare --Saibo 19:44, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC) linkfix - sorry --Saibo 21:25, 10. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Unable to re-review

In de.wp, with the current implementation of FlaggedRevs, in some cases it is useful (changes in images or templates) or necessary (system displaying old revisions even though a recent reviewed version exists - or similar technical issues) to review a revision already reviewed. This appears not to be possible any more. --YMS 09:32, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Are there actually pending template/file changes? The button should show then. Voice of All 21:19, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Translation in page review statistics

The current translation for "The average lag for pages with unreviewed edits pending is 45h37m41s. These pages are considered outdated." is "Der durchschnittliche Rückstand auf veraltete Seiten beträgt 45h37m41s. Diese Seiten werden als veraltet angesehen." This is nonsense, since it explains "veraltet" as "veraltet". Should be "Veraltete Seiten sind Seiten mit Bearbeitungen, die neuer als die markierte Version sind.", like in de.wp now.

Fixed in translatewiki: [3]. Raymond 12:25, 8. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

The sentence "Statistiken für jeden Namensraum, ausgenommen sind Weiterleitungen." is missing a verb - stick with the current de.wp version "Das sind Statistiken für jeden Namensraum, ausgenommen Weiterleitungen."

Fixed in translatewiki: [4] Raymond 12:25, 8. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

If changed anyway, please change "Nachfolgend die Liste der 5 Benutzer..." to "Nachfolgend die Liste der fünf Benutzer...", which is the correct way to spell numbers up to 12. --YMS 09:50, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Fixed in translatewiki: [5]. Raymond 12:25, 8. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Translation "überprüfte Version" for "accepted version"

...is not a good idea, since a concept similar to the quality versions is still in discussion for de.wp as "Geprüfte Versionen". Stick with "gesichtete Version".

The other changes in translations I noticed (like "Unmarkierte Änderungen" instead of "Entwurf", "Akzeptieren" instead of "Speichern", ...), are okay, I think. --YMS 09:46, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

I do not see why there should be a change in the wording at all. --Saibo 19:26, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

For example "Unmarkierte Änderungen" is way longer than "Entwurf". Please do not waste space. --Saibo 19:39, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Settings: Spezial:Einstellungen - Tab Stabilität

These two options are missing (compared to current de.wikip):

• Zeige beim Bearbeiten einen Versionsvergleich zur stabilen Version
• Zeige beim Anschauen eines Entwurfs einen Versionsvergleich zur stabilen Version

--Saibo 19:10, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

They are under the 'diff' and 'editing' sections. Voice of All 21:57, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

The second one should probably be moved back under the flaggedrevs preference tab though. Voice of All 22:02, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

The new translation to German of the tab's title is currently: "Bearbeitungsberechtigung". That's a bit strange and not self-explanatory. In addition, wording in this settings tab is not consistent: there is "Freigabe", "Veröffentlichung" and "stabile Version". All three mean the same thing, I guess, so they should use the same words. --Saibo 21:33, 10. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Watchlist

"[sichten]" notice of review needed is too big. ! is enough - as it was before. --Saibo 19:20, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

article history with unmarked versions

...like it is currently in Memmingen. Looks ugly: There is an empty line between the unmarked and the next version. --Saibo 19:28, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, everybody!

Thanks, everybody for your testing. This is very helpful! -- William Pietri 21:14, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

article history "marked by ... notice"

It is currently "[markiert von Saibo]". It should be "[gesichtet von Saibo]". --Saibo 22:14, 10. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

all articles here are copyvios

... aren't they? Nice to have real articles here, but as far as I can see they do not have the correct history with the authors. --Saibo 19:23, 7. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

Hi Saibo,

thanks for reporting this. As per the foundation:Terms of Use, a hyperlink to the original version that includes an author history is required. This hyperlink wasn't included in the footer; I've hacked a backlink into MediaWiki:Wikimedia-copyright. Feel free to suggest refinements on the talk page there.--Eloquence 01:13, 8. Jun. 2010 (UTC)

What about quality versions?

In some WM-projects there are quality versions enabled (e.g. de-wikiquote). Here at labs I still have reviewer rights, but this extensions seems to be disabled? Is there any place I can test if the announced new flaggedrevs extensions has any implications to our quality versions on de-wq? --Stepro 15:31, 9. Jun. 2010 (UTC)